Graphic Benchmarks

From the datasheet

	Entry	XS	XZ	Elan
2D Vectors	600K	260K	520K	1M
3D Vectors, DepthCued	380K	140K	280K	555K
3D Tmesh (F, Nz)	100K	98K	196K	370K
3D Tmesh (GS, Z, L)	26K	50K	100K	180K
3D Quad (GS, Z, L)	13K	24K	45K	88K
Screen Clear	19msec	9msec	9msec	9msec
Fill Rate Rectangle (500x500)	40M	40M	40M	40M

All Tests are made on the R4000/100MHZ Prozessor. The Entry performance seems very good, but since all 3D graphic operations are done in software, this is mainly a processor benchmark. When you use the express graphic, you may have slow benchmarks, but since the CPU is not loaded that much, your application may be faster. For the complex 3D primitives, the XS beats the Entry.

From the periodic tables

R3000/33MHz

	Entry	XS/24	Elan
2D Vectors	600K
3D Vectors	490K	270K	1M
Tmesh	40K	76K	270K
Polygons		29K	120K

R4000/100MHz

	Entry	XS/24	XZ	Elan
2D Vectors	450K
3D Vectors	230K	270K	530K	1M
Tmesh	20K	76K	150K	270K
Polygons		29K	58K	115K