From 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com  Wed Oct  6 15:28:59 1993
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 93 15:28:50 PDT
From: 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com
Message-Id: <9310062228.AA22374@hac2arpa.hac.com>
Subject: Flight format V. 12
Status: OR

From: Miyagishima, Daryl K
Date: Wed, Oct 6, 1993 3:26 PM
Subject: Flight format V. 12
To: info-performer
Hi everyone,

Is there a version of the pfflt library out there that is compatible with 
version 12.0 of MultiGen.  I am currently using Performer 1.0 and it is only 
compatible with version 11.0 of MultiGen.  I am looking for compatibility in 
reading and dealing with textures.  Thanks!

Daryl Miyagishima
Hughes Research Labs




From aschaffe  Wed Oct  6 16:09:10 1993
From: aschaffe (Allan Schaffer)
Message-Id: <9310061609.ZM8082@holodeck.asd.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1993 16:09:09 -0700
To: 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com
Subject: Re: Flight format V. 12
Cc: info-performer
Status: OR

On Oct 6,  3:28pm, 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com wrote:
>
> Is there a version of the pfflt library out there that is compatible with
> version 12.0 of MultiGen.  I am currently using Performer 1.0 and it is only
> compatible with version 11.0 of MultiGen.  I am looking for compatibility in
> reading and dealing with textures.  Thanks!
>
> Daryl Miyagishima
> Hughes Research Labs

A MultiGen 12 version of LoadFlt() is/will be included with Performer
1.2, but for those of you who need it now, it's my understanding that
you can get it from Software Systems (the makers of MultiGen).

I'd wager that a few people on the list have already done this,
and can comment further..

Allan


-- 
Allan Schaffer
Silicon Graphics
aschaffe@sgi.com

From aschaffe  Wed Oct  6 22:02:19 1993
From: "Michael Jones" <mtj@babar>
Message-Id: <9310062159.ZM10207@babar.asd.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1993 21:59:04 -0700
To: aschaffe (Allan Schaffer)
Subject: Re: Flight format V. 12
Status: OR

For those looking for a version 12 loader right now, the contact at
Software Systems is:
    
    Mr. Norm Miller
    Software Systems
    1884 The Alameda
    San Jose, CA  95126
    P: (408) 247-4326
    F: (408) 247-4329
    multigen!norm@uunet.UU.NET

-- 

Be seeing you,      mtj@sgi.com  415.390.1455  M/S 7L-590
Michael Jones       Silicon Graphics, Advanced Graphics Division
                    2011 N. Shoreline Blvd., Mtn. View, CA 94039-7311


From giraffe.asd.sgi.com!sgi.sgi.com!uunet.UU.NET!rayssd!swlrgk.msd.ray.com!swl!shj  Thu Oct  7 06:33:36 1993
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 93 08:16:40 EDT
From: "Stephen Joyce {75069}" <shj@swlvx2.msd.ray.com>
Message-Id: <9310071216.AA04707@swlrgk>
To: 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com, aschaffe
Subject: Re: Flight format V. 12
Cc: info-performer
Status: OR

Yes - I've gotten from Software Systems the v12 loader. However,
we had problems installing it until we got the source code for it
and recompiled it ourselves. In order to do this we had to sign
their non-disclosure agreement.



From guest  Thu Apr 14 14:43:06 1994
From: "Stephen Joyce {75069}" <shj@swl.msd.ray.com>
Message-Id: <9404142141.AA23620@swlrgk>
To: info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
Status: OR


  If you have a very large MultiGen flight formatted data base,
does Performer experience performance problems in traversing it?

What would the bottlenecks be for traversing a large terrain database?


Also, thank you for meeting with us yesterday and answering our questions.

Thank you,
Steve Joyce



From guest  Wed Apr 20 13:39:28 1994
Message-Id: <9404202039.AA25825@Crazypete.AI.SRI.COM>
To: "Stephen Joyce {75069}" <shj@swl.msd.ray.com>
Cc: info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 14 Apr 1994 17:41:30 EDT."
             <9404142141.AA23620@swlrgk> 
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 1994 13:39:33 -0700
From: Stephen Lau <lau@ai.sri.com>
Status: OR


>What would the bottlenecks be for traversing a large terrain database?

How large is large? For some of us gigabytes of terrain is considered
"small". 

Steve

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Lau                 lau@ai.sri.com| "No, no, not Orwellian, HUXLEY!
SRI International                         |    Brave New World."
333 Ravenswood Ave., Menlo Park, CA. 94025|   - George Coates, "Box Conspiracy:
(415) 859-2925              (415) 326-6200|     An Interactive Sho"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------




From 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com  Wed Oct  6 15:28:59 1993
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 93 15:28:50 PDT
From: 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com
Message-Id: <9310062228.AA22374@hac2arpa.hac.com>
Subject: Flight format V. 12
Status: OR

From: Miyagishima, Daryl K
Date: Wed, Oct 6, 1993 3:26 PM
Subject: Flight format V. 12
To: info-performer
Hi everyone,

Is there a version of the pfflt library out there that is compatible with 
version 12.0 of MultiGen.  I am currently using Performer 1.0 and it is only 
compatible with version 11.0 of MultiGen.  I am looking for compatibility in 
reading and dealing with textures.  Thanks!

Daryl Miyagishima
Hughes Research Labs




From aschaffe  Wed Oct  6 16:09:10 1993
From: aschaffe (Allan Schaffer)
Message-Id: <9310061609.ZM8082@holodeck.asd.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1993 16:09:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com
        "Flight format V. 12" (Oct  6,  3:28pm)
References: <9310062228.AA22374@hac2arpa.hac.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0B.0 25aug93 MediaMail)
To: 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com
Subject: Re: Flight format V. 12
Cc: info-performer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Status: OR

On Oct 6,  3:28pm, 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com wrote:
>
> Is there a version of the pfflt library out there that is compatible with
> version 12.0 of MultiGen.  I am currently using Performer 1.0 and it is only
> compatible with version 11.0 of MultiGen.  I am looking for compatibility in
> reading and dealing with textures.  Thanks!
>
> Daryl Miyagishima
> Hughes Research Labs

A MultiGen 12 version of LoadFlt() is/will be included with Performer
1.2, but for those of you who need it now, it's my understanding that
you can get it from Software Systems (the makers of MultiGen).

I'd wager that a few people on the list have already done this,
and can comment further..

Allan


-- 
Allan Schaffer
Silicon Graphics
aschaffe@sgi.com

From aschaffe  Wed Oct  6 22:02:19 1993
Resent-From: aschaffe (Allan Schaffer)
Resent-Message-Id: <9310062202.ZM9082@holodeck.asd.sgi.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1993 22:02:19 -0700
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0B.0 25aug93 MediaMail)
Resent-To: info-performer
From: "Michael Jones" <mtj@babar>
Message-Id: <9310062159.ZM10207@babar.asd.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1993 21:59:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: aschaffe@holodeck (Allan Schaffer)
        "Re: Flight format V. 12" (Oct  6,  4:09pm)
References: <9310062228.AA22374@hac2arpa.hac.com> 
	<9310061609.ZM8082@holodeck.asd.sgi.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0B.0 25aug93 MediaMail)
To: aschaffe (Allan Schaffer)
Subject: Re: Flight format V. 12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Status: OR

For those looking for a version 12 loader right now, the contact at
Software Systems is:
    
    Mr. Norm Miller
    Software Systems
    1884 The Alameda
    San Jose, CA  95126
    P: (408) 247-4326
    F: (408) 247-4329
    multigen!norm@uunet.UU.NET

-- 

Be seeing you,      mtj@sgi.com  415.390.1455  M/S 7L-590
Michael Jones       Silicon Graphics, Advanced Graphics Division
                    2011 N. Shoreline Blvd., Mtn. View, CA 94039-7311


From giraffe.asd.sgi.com!sgi.sgi.com!uunet.UU.NET!rayssd!swlrgk.msd.ray.com!swl!shj  Thu Oct  7 06:33:36 1993
From: "Stephen Joyce {75069}" <shj@swlvx2.msd.ray.com>
Message-Id: <9310071216.AA04707@swlrgk>
To: 00A4269@msgate.emis.hac.com, aschaffe
Subject: Re: Flight format V. 12
Cc: info-performer
Status: OR

Yes - I've gotten from Software Systems the v12 loader. However,
we had problems installing it until we got the source code for it
and recompiled it ourselves. In order to do this we had to sign
their non-disclosure agreement.



From aschaffe  Thu Oct 14 18:29:41 1993
Resent-From: aschaffe (Allan Schaffer)
Resent-Message-Id: <9310141829.ZM8833@holodeck.asd.sgi.com>
Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1993 18:29:41 -0700
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0B.0 25aug93 MediaMail)
Resent-To: info-performer-dist
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 93 18:14:12 -0700
From: jrohlf@tubes (John Rohlf)
Message-Id: <9310150114.AA18355@tubes.asd.sgi.com>
To: "Stephen Joyce {75069}" <shj@swlvx2.msd.ray.com>,
        info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: materials
Status: OR

>  Does anyone know how to look at MultiGen flight files
>with materials from material palettes while in Performer.
>
>Our models don't show the materials when using perfly 1.0
>or perfly 1.1.

The .flt converter provided in 1.0 and 1.1 used lmcolor() mode for
optimal performance. However this meant that multigen materials were
not rendered faithfully. If you want exact correspondence between
Performer and multigen materials then call Software Systems and ask
for their new loader.






From mclink.it!MC9258  Wed Feb 23 06:25:47 1994 remote from uunet
To: multigen!paul
Subject: Loadflt & Callback
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 12:25:30 CET
From: "Infobyte S.R.L." <uunet!mclink.it!MC9258>
Message-Id:  <9402231225.aa15991@ax433.mclink.it>
Status: OR

Hi Paul,
it works.
Disabling cleanTree the nodes don't disappear and can be obtained
as parents of the intersected objects (they are transformed in
Performer groups), i.e.

        pfNode  *node;

        pfQueryHits(hits[0][0], PFQHIT_NODE, &node)
        printf ( "%s", pfGetNodeName ( pfGetParent(node, 0) ) );

And enabling cleanTree, the callback with CB_CLEANNODE detects that
the nodes are effectively deleted by that function.

Thank you.

Three more questions:

1) How much performance is lost, disabling cleanTree? 

2) I have noticed that, in my case, MultiGen objects are deleted,
   but MultiGen groups are not. Is this a general rule, so I
   can work with groups if I don't want an "object" deleted,
   or I have to verify every time with CB_CLEANNODE?

3) In the README.SS file is written that with the CB_CLEANNODE 
   "the application can take the appropriate actions". 
   Which are these appropriate actions? Is there a way to know
   which is the new address of the node?

Thank you again.

Massimo Cuomo - Infobyte - mc9258@mclink.it


=========================================
MAILBOX
Msg# 62445, 22/02/94 21:10 [4095]
Da: Paul@multigenuunet.uu.net
A : MC9258 Infobyte S.R.L.
-----------------------------------------
Oggetto: Re: FWD>Loadflt Callback And

From ammi.mclink.it!relay2.uu.net!uunet.uu.net!multigen!paul Tue Feb 22
21:08:44 1994 remote from ax433
CET
15:06:08 -0500
 id AA01128; Tue, 22 Feb 1994 12:06:11 PST
Message-Id: <00581.2844763571.1128@multigenuunet.UU.NET>
Organization: Software Systems
X-Charset: MACINTOSH
X-Umcp-To: Infobyte S.R.L.
From: Paul <Paul@multigenuunet.uu.net>
To: "Infobyte S.R.L." <MC9258@mclink.it>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 10:13:23 PST
Subject: Re: FWD>Loadflt Callback And 

        Reply to:   RE>FWD>Loadflt Callback And Pfnode
Dear Massimo,

My name is Paul Mlyniec.  I have been maintaining the Flight format loader
for some time.  I would guess that your problem stems from cleanTree
removing the nodes of interest.  You can disable the call to cleanTree
with
a call to LoadFltMode() to test this hypothesis. (See README.SS in
/usr/src/Performer/src/lib/libpfflt).  Also note the CB_CLEANNODE callback
in README.SS.  Feel free to call me if you are still having problems.  My
phone number is (408) 261-4123.  Please let me know how this turns out in
any case, so that I can pass along the info to others.  Thanks.

Paul Mlyniec
Software Systems
1884 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126

(408) 261-4123

multigen!paul@uunet.UU.NET


--------------------------------------
Date: 2/18/94 9:16 AM
To: Paul
From: Marcus
From guest  Wed Feb 23 16:21:31 1994
Message-Id: <00581.2844865374.1132@multigenuunet.UU.NET>
Organization: Software Systems
X-Charset: MACINTOSH
X-Umcp-To: INFO PERFORMER
From: Marcus <Marcus@multigenuunet.uu.net>
To: INFO PERFORMER <info-performer@sgi.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 1994 16:05:18 PST
Subject: Re: Loadflt & Callback 
Status: O

        Reply to:   RE>Loadflt & Callback
Dear Massimo,

Thanks for getting back to me with the good news.  I'll post the results for
the general public now.  As for your followup questions:

1) The cost of disabling cleanTree is not great.  Traversal of additional
pfNodes is the price you pay and this is not so bad.

2) It is true that MultiGen objects are generally deleted. This is because
they are converted to pfGroups mostly to preserve their names in the scene
graph.  Certain hierarchies can cause groups to disappear as well, so I
would recommend using the CB_CLEANNODE callback for protection.  You also
have the option of obtaining the source to modify the behavior of cleanTree.
For instance, you could tag pfGroups that correspond to objects so that
cleanTree leaves them alone.  Incidentally, future revisions of the loader
will probably allow the application to veto the deletion of pfNodes by
cleanTree.

3) "Appropriate action" generally means that the application [can] no longer
count on the existence of the soon-to-be-deleted node.  Unfortunately, the
node has already been unlinked from the scene graph when you are called with
a CB_CLEANNODE.  It is to late to change this for the current release of the
loader, but again, you could obtain the source and reverse the order of the
unlink and callback calls.

Good Luck,

Paul Mlyniec
Software Systems

--------------------------------------
Date: 2/23/94 7:55 AM
To: Paul
From: Infobyte S.R.L.
From guest  Wed Jan 26 07:47:52 1994
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 17:46:49 +0200
From: rany@bvr.co.il (Ran Yakir)
Message-Id: <9401261546.AA01311@amcor.bvr.co.il>
To: info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: 1.0/1.1 bug in LoadFlt
Status: OR


Actualy, not in LoadFlt buf in one of its static functions named -
getTexture (and resides in pfflt/geom.c).
getTexture attepts to read the attributes file (.attr) using the line

	read(ifd, (char*)&texAttr, stbuf.st_size);

where :
1. stbuf is the buffer returned by stat(), and stbuf.st_size containts
   the attributes file size.
2. texAttr is a structure that will contain the full contents of the file.

If, for some reason, the .attr file is larger then its minimal size, 
the read command will run over texAttr right into the rest of the stack, and
mess things up. You won't notice it at first, but then some malloc() will
core you dump (or dump your core).

What should be done (and is easy to do on-site) is replacing the line
with :

	read(ifd, (char*)&texAttr, sizeof texAttr);


Good luck

	Ran Yakir

 __                                  | Ran Yakir
 /_)  _  __   \  / _   / o __        | Phone :
/ )_ (_(_) )   \/ (_(_/<_(_)(        |   Work : 972-3-5715671
              _/                     |   Res. : 972-3-6995364
                                     | E-mail : rany@bvr.co.il





From guest  Wed Jan 26 08:13:38 1994
From: "Michael Jones" <mtj@babar>
Message-Id: <9401260812.ZM15156@babar.asd.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 08:12:22 -0800
In-Reply-To: rany@bvr.co.il (Ran Yakir)
        "1.0/1.1 bug in LoadFlt" (Jan 26,  5:46pm)
References: <9401261546.AA01311@amcor.bvr.co.il>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.110 10jan94 MediaMail)
To: rany@bvr.co.il (Ran Yakir), info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 1.0/1.1 bug in LoadFlt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Status: OR

On Jan 26,  5:46pm, Ran Yakir wrote:
> Subject: 1.0/1.1 bug in LoadFlt
:
:Actualy, not in LoadFlt buf in one of its static functions named -
:getTexture (and resides in pfflt/geom.c).
:getTexture attepts to read the attributes file (.attr) using the line
:
:	read(ifd, (char*)&texAttr, stbuf.st_size);
:
:where :
:1. stbuf is the buffer returned by stat(), and stbuf.st_size containts
:   the attributes file size.
:2. texAttr is a structure that will contain the full contents of the file.
:
:If, for some reason, the .attr file is larger then its minimal size,
:the read command will run over texAttr right into the rest of the stack, and
:mess things up. You won't notice it at first, but then some malloc() will
:core you dump (or dump your core).
:
:What should be done (and is easy to do on-site) is replacing the line
:with :
:
:	read(ifd, (char*)&texAttr, sizeof texAttr);

Good observation. This was indeed a bug in LoadFlt() and the fix given
by Ran Yakir is the right one.

-- 

Be seeing you,      mtj@sgi.com  415.390.1455  M/S 7L-590
Michael Jones       Silicon Graphics, Advanced Graphics Division
                    2011 N. Shoreline Blvd., Mtn. View, CA 94039-7311






From rany Wed Jan 26 17:46:46 1994
To: info-performer@sgi.com
Subject: 1.0/1.1 bug in LoadFlt
Status: OR


Actualy, not in LoadFlt buf in one of its static functions named -
getTexture (and resides in pfflt/geom.c).
getTexture attepts to read the attributes file (.attr) using the line

	read(ifd, (char*)&texAttr, stbuf.st_size);

where :
1. stbuf is the buffer returned by stat(), and stbuf.st_size containts
   the attributes file size.
2. texAttr is a structure that will contain the full contents of the file.

If, for some reason, the .attr file is larger then its minimal size, 
the read command will run over texAttr right into the rest of the stack, and
mess things up. You won't notice it at first, but then some malloc() will
core you dump (or dump your core).

What should be done (and is easy to do on-site) is replacing the line
with :

	read(ifd, (char*)&texAttr, sizeof texAttr);


Good luck

	Ran Yakir

 __                                  | Ran Yakir
 /_)  _  __   \  / _   / o __        | Phone :
/ )_ (_(_) )   \/ (_(_/<_(_)(        |   Work : 972-3-5715671
              _/                     |   Res. : 972-3-6995364
                                     | E-mail : rany@bvr.co.il

 __                                  | Ran Yakir
 /_)  _  __   \  / _   / o __        | Phone :
/ )_ (_(_) )   \/ (_(_/<_(_)(        |   Work : 972-3-5715671
              _/                     |   Res. : 972-3-6995364
                                     | E-mail : rany@bvr.co.il





From guest  Fri Feb 18 06:38:30 1994
To: info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: Loadflt Callback And Pfnodes
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:37:56 CET
From: "Infobyte S.R.L." <MC9258@mclink.it>
Message-Id:  <9402181537.aa19654@ax433.mclink.it>
Status: OR

Hi all,
I am "playing" with Performer1.2a81.irix5 beta and I have experienced 
a strange behavior: 

I am using the callback functions with LoadFlt routine.

At loading time (in the callback function), I print the addresses of 
the Performer nodes and their names that are (by default) the same 
of MultiGen ones.
When, after in the application, I print the same addresses (from
the pfHit structure after a collision I can obtain the Geodes), 
they are different for the objects. 
I am sure that the nodes are the right ones because
I know the polygons of the objects and because if I print the adresses
and names of the Parents of the nodes, they are the right ones.
Further when I try to find the addresses of the objects by name with
pfFind,
it doesn't work for them (NULL return values), but it works fine for
the parent groups or lods.

It seems that the objects' addresses are in some way changed and their 
names deleted, while groups' and lods' are not.

Is it possible or is there anything else I have to do (or not to do!). 

Thank you in advance for any help.

Massimo Cuomo - Infobyte - mc9258@mclink.it



From guest  Tue Mar 22 19:47:31 1994
Message-Id: <9403230347.AA05724@surreal.asd.sgi.com>
To: "Infobyte S.R.L." <MC9258@mclink.it>
Cc: info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Loadflt Callback And Pfnodes 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:37:56 +0700."
             <9402181537.aa19654@ax433.mclink.it> 
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 19:47:16 -0800
From: Jim Helman <jimh@surreal>
Status: OR

As a performance optimization the loader "flattens" (removes static
xform by applying them to geoemtry) and "cleans" (removes
unnecessary nodes) the scene graph.  Since flattening has to
duplicate instanced subgraphs, you may find some new nodes in your
scene graph.  Since clean removes nodes, some may be missing as
well.  See LoadFltMode to change this behavior, or use callbacks
or pfFind<Node> to reconstruct the information you need on the
optimized scene graph.

rgds,

-jim helman

jimh@surreal.asd.sgi.com
415/390-1151

  To: info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
  Subject: Loadflt Callback And Pfnodes
  Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:37:56 CET
  From: "Infobyte S.R.L." <MC9258@mclink.it>
  Message-Id:  <9402181537.aa19654@ax433.mclink.it>
  
  Hi all,
  I am "playing" with Performer1.2a81.irix5 beta and I have experienced 
  a strange behavior: 
  
  I am using the callback functions with LoadFlt routine.
  
  At loading time (in the callback function), I print the addresses of
  the Performer nodes and their names that are (by default) the same of
  MultiGen ones.  When, after in the application, I print the same
  addresses (from the pfHit structure after a collision I can obtain the
  Geodes), they are different for the objects.  I am sure that the nodes
  are the right ones because I know the polygons of the objects and
  because if I print the adresses and names of the Parents of the nodes,
  they are the right ones.  Further when I try to find the addresses of
  the objects by name with pfFind, it doesn't work for them (NULL return
  values), but it works fine for the parent groups or lods.
  
  It seems that the objects' addresses are in some way changed and their 
  names deleted, while groups' and lods' are not.
  
  Is it possible or is there anything else I have to do (or not to do!). 
  
  Thank you in advance for any help.
  
  Massimo Cuomo - Infobyte - mc9258@mclink.it
  
  
  







From guest  Fri Jul  1 09:41:36 1994
From: "Annie SIMEAU" <asim@alice.paris.sgi.com>
Message-Id: <9407011710.ZM4547@alice.paris.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 1994 17:10:53 -0600
X-Mailer: Z-Mail-SGI (3.0S.1023 23oct93 MediaMail)
To: info-performer@sgi.sgi.com, asim@alice.paris.sgi.com
Subject: Performer 1.2 Loadflt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Status: OR

Hi everybody,

I am looking for the limitation of the Loadflt function.
When loading more than 17 files .flt the program core dump without any message
 the stack is :
MyFunction, LoadFlt, convTree, convTree, convTree, convTree, convTree,
convTree, makeGeometry, makeGeode, pfNewGeode, pfBuffer

When all the data base is in one file everything is OK.

I can have a test program,

Any help is welcome.





-- 


       /|           o         Annie Simeau, Country ID: IFR-340
      /_|   _   _     _      asim@paris.sgi.com
     /  |  / ) / ) / /_) .  Phone Number : 33 1 34 88 80 88
    /   |_/ /_/ /_/_(_  .  Fax Number : 33 1 34 88 80 76





From guest  Thu Feb 17 14:44:16 1994
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 94 14:43:49 PST
From: penafiel@guild.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Hugo Penafiel)
Message-Id: <9402172243.AA12773@guild.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
To: mwilliam@ldsa.com, info-performer@sgi.sgi.com
Subject: DTED loader
Status: OR


The only two companies I know that have a DTED to MultiGen Flight Format
converter are Software Systems Inc. in San Jose, CA and Coryphaeus Software
in Los Gatos, CA.  I have an address and phone number for Coryphaeus:

985 University Ave., Suite 31
Los Gatos, CA  95030
Phone: (408) 395-4537
Fax: (408) 395-6351

Good luck!

Hugo Penafiel
Phone: (415) 424-2913
e-mail: penafiel@guild.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Research & Development Division
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.
Palo Alto, CA




